Retains permanents canines in patients at the University Pediatrics Hospital "Centro Habana", 2012-2015
Abstract
Introduction: Permanent canines are important teeth for the stomatognatic system. Their retention, when caused by a physical limitation in their eruption, should be treated soon with orthodontic appliances that allow an early rehabilitation and avoid more invasive surgical treatments.Objective: To characterize pediatric patients with retained permanent canines treated in the Maxillofacial Surgery Serviceof the Pediatric Hospital of Centro Havana, from 2012 to 2015.
Material and Methods: A descriptive retrospective study was conducted in pediatric patients with retained permanent canines who were treated in the Maxillofacial Surgery Service during period mentioned.
Results: There was a predominance in the female sex (69 %). The age of higher detection of this tooth anomaly was 13 years old. (26 %). The most retained permanent canine was the upper right one (62 %). The most frequent type of retention was the unilateral one (67 %). Class I maxillary retention was the one that had the greatest clinical presentation (25 %). Surgical exeresis was the most used treatment (50 %). Conclusions: In the pediatric patients studied, the retained canines presented mainly in the female sex, and 13 years old was the age in which there was a greater detection of this tooth anomaly. The upper right permanent canine in the palatine zone is the most retained (13), and exeresis is the most used treatment.
Keywords: retained permanent canines, tooth retention, surgical-orthodontic treatment.
Downloads
References
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
1. Lira A, Motes AJ, Melo E. Caninos superiores permanentes impactados. Revisión de literatura y presentación de caso clínico. Rev Acta Odontol Venez [internet], 2011 [citado 2015 Enero 4]; 49(1):1-2. Disponible en: http: //www. actaodontologica.com/ ediciones/ 2011 /1/ art20.asp
2. Quintana JC, Algozain Y, Quintana M. Trata¬miento quirúrgico de los dientes retenidos en el servicio de cirugía maxilofacial de Artemisa (1994- 2010). Rev Acta Odontol Col [internet] 2015, [citado 2015 Sep 20]; 5(1): 57-63. Disponible en: http:// www. revistas.unal.edu.co/ index.php/actaodontocol
3. Revelo Pérez LA, Espinosa Morales JG. Transmigración del canino mandibular. Reporte de un caso clínico y revisión de la literatura. Rev ADM [Internet]. 2013[citado 2014 Jul 28]; 70(4). Disponible en :http : //www.medigraphic.com/ pdfs/adm/od-2013/od134h.pdf
4. Vázquez D, Martínez M. Frecuencia de retenciones dentarias en radiografías panorámicas, presentación de un estudio de 1000 pacientes. Rev Acta Odontol Venez. 2013; 51(1):3.
5. Ries Centeno G. Cirugía bucal. 10ma Edición. Buenos Aires: Editorial El Ateneo; 2001; 21-30.
6. Upegui JC, Echeverri E, Ramírez DM. Determinación del pronóstico en pacientes que presentan caninos maxilares impactados de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Antioquia. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2009; 21(1): 75-85.
7. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod 1994; 64(4): 249-56.
8. Kuftinec MM, Stom D, Shapira Y. The impacted maxillary canine: II. Clinical approaches and solutions. J Dent Child1995; 62(5): 325-34.
9. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Early diagnosis and interception of potential maxillary canine impaction. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129(10): 1450-54.
10. Prskalo K, Zjaca K, Skarić-Jurić T, Nikolić I, Anić-Milosević S, Lauc T. The prevalence of lateral incisor hypodontia and canine impaction in Croatian population. Coll Antropol 2009; 32(4): 1105-09.
11. Schindel RH, Duffy SL. Maxillary transverse discrepancies and potentially impacted maxillary canines in mixed dentition patients. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(3): 430-435.
12. Kim NY, Baek SH. Cleft sidedness and congenitally missing or malformed permanent maxillary lateral incisors in Korean patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130(6): 752-758.
13. Torres D, Hita P, Azcárate F. What are the histologic effects of surgical and orthodontic treatment on the gingiva of palatal impacted canines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73(12):2273-81.
14. Jain S, Agrawal M, Jain S, Jain S. Evaluation of the mandibular arch in patients with impacted permanent lower canines. Aust Orthod J. 2015 May; 31(1):37-41.
15. Miresmaeili A, Farhadian N, Mollabashi V, Yousefi F. Web-based evaluation of experts' opinions on impacted maxillary canines forced eruption using CBCT. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015; 20(2):90-9.
16. Troya Borges E, Martinez Abreu J, Padilla Suárez E, Matos Campo MR. Tratamiento quirúrgico de caninos retenidos en el municipio Colón. Años 2013–2014. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2016 [citado: 2017 Jun 4]; 38(2). Disponible en: http://www. revmedicae lectronica .sld.cu/index. php/rme/article/view/2940/1608
17. Flores JM. Manejo quirúrgico de caninos retenidos. Revista de Actualización Clínica.2012;(2)8:1371-74.
18. Archer W. Cirugía bucal. 2da Edición. Michigan: Editorial Mundi; 2009: 151.
19. Donado Manuel, Blanco Samper. Cirugía bucal. Patología y técnica. 3ra edición. Madrid: Editorial Masson; 2005:p.443- 51.
20. Lars A. Tratamiento de las inclusiones dentarias. Otras inclusiones. En: Navarro C. Cirugía Oral. Madrid: Editorial Elservier; 2014. Disponible en: http://es. slideshare.net/ danisL Su/ retenciones-dentarias-cirugía-bucal.
Download PDF
