The scientific problem in original articles published in Cuban biomedical journals
Abstract
Introducción:The formulation of the scientific problem in a research article is a key element for its understanding and reproducibility. If it is not defined or if it is incorrectly formulated, it would inevitably lead to the creation of a document which would be very difficult to understand and repl
Objective:To identify the most common lines of research in Cuban biomedical journals indexed in SciELO, the frequency of research articles with a correctly defined scientific problem, and the most common errors in its formulation.
Material and Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in research articles that were published in 2016 in 32 Cuban biomedical journals indexed in SciELO. The most frequent lines of research were obtained from 5 836 keywords. The percentage of publication with a correctly defined scientific problem was estimated by a random selection of a sample of 50 articles, and the percentage of publications with a correctly defined scientific problem was also calculated. Percentages of errors according to type were measured in each article.
Results:The most frequent lines of research associated with keywords were: medical education, risk factors, and secondary health care. Only 36% of the works formulated the scientific problem correctly. No article made a critical assessment of it, and the 58 % included methods to address it.
Conclusions:The lines of research identified in the articles under study may appear to be of minor interest for biomedical research. The research articles with not defined or incorrectly formulated scientific problems increase the difficulties for their analysis, discussion, and review of scientific results. The most common errors in the formulation of the scientific problem suggest that the main motivation could not be the dissemination of a scientific result, but the publication itself.
Keywords:research question, hypothesis, research project, scientific research, original article.
Downloads
References
1. Bayarre H. Metodología de la investigación en APS. Habana: ECIMED; 2004.
2. Castellanos Serra L, Rodríguez C. La ciencia cubana vista a través de sus publicaciones: una revisión de los últimos 19 años. En: CUB. Acto por el 15 aniversario de la RHCM; Centro de Convenciones Cojimar 2017.
3. Silva Ayçaguer LC. La investigación biomédica y sus laberintos: Ediciones Díaz de Santos; 2008.
4. Silva Ayçaguer LC. Deficiencias en la formulación de problemas de investigación en ciencias de la salud. Metas de Enferm. 2004; 7:51. Disponible en: http://lcsilva.sbhac.net/Articulos/23.Deficiencias_en_la_formulacion_de_problemas_de_investigacion.pdf
5. Marta MM. A brief history of the evolution of the medical research article. Clujul Medical. 2015;88(4):567.
6. De Jonge E, van der Loo M. An introduction to data cleaning with R. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. 2013.
7. Ecimed. Manual de normas y procedimientos. La Habana: Ecimed, 2012.
8. Masic I. Plagiarism in scientific publishing. Acta Informatica Medica. 2012;20(4):208.
9. Almetric. Top 100 articles 2016 2017 [updated 13/11/2017; cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.altmetric.com/top100/2016/.
10. Cuba. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2016. La Habana: Dirección de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud; 2016. Acceso: 25 Agos 2016. 2015.
11. Dausset J. Respetar el patrimonio genético del hombre. El Correo de la UNESCO, mayo. 1988:16-20.
Download PDF
