High-resolution manometry for diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders. Introduction in Cuba
Keywords:
High-resolution esophageal manometry, reflux, achalasia, esophageal motor disorders.Abstract
Introduction: High-resolution esophageal manometry is considered internationally as an optimal method for diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders. Given the recent introduction of the technique in Cuba, it is necessary to demonstrate its usefulness in our country where there is no prior knowledge about the most frequent parameters of normality and high resolution diagnoses.
Objective: To determine the usefulness of high-resolution esophageal manometry as a method for the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders in Cuba.
Material and methods: An applied developmental research was designed and carried out at the National Center for Minimal Access Surgery in Havana between June 2017 and June 2019. The study included patients in whom esophageal manometry was performed. The universe consisted of 611 patients and the variables used in the study were recorded.
Results: Of the 611 patients who underwent esophageal manometry, 356 were women (58.26 %) and 255 were men (42.73 %), with an average age of 47 and 44 years, respectively. Ineffective motility was the most frequent motor disorder (32,73 %). In patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, the main damage of the antireflux barrier was the presence of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. Type II achalasia predominated (5,23 %). In these patients, integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) values above 21 were recorded.
Conclusions: Values applicable to Cuban patients that allow to establish a high-resolution diagnosis were established.
Downloads
References
1. Cohen S. Motor disorders of the esophagus. New Eng J Med [Internet]. 1979 [Citado 12/05/2020];301(4):184-92. Disponible en: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm197907263010404.
2. Ruiz de Leon San Juan A, Pérez de la Serna, Bueno J, Sevilla Mantilla MC. Trastornos motores esofágicos primarios. En: Díaz Rubio M, Rey Díaz Rubio E. Trastornos motores del aparato digestivo. 2 ed. Madrid: Médica Panamericana; 2007.p.83-102.
3. Van Hoeij FB, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical application of esophageal high resolution manometry in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2016 [Citado 12/05/2020];22(1):6-13. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699717/.
4. Orlowski J, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Dent J, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC. Requirements for accurate manometric recording of pharyngeal and esophageal peristaltic pressure waves. Invest Radiol. 1982;17: 567-72.
5. Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. High resolution manometry. Digestive and Liver Disease 2008; 40:174-181.
6. Yadlapati R. High resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice. Curr Opin Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 12/05/2020];33:301-9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/28426462/
7. Grubel C , Hiscock R , Hebbard G . Value of spatio temporal representation of manometric data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [internet]. 2008 [Citado 12/05/2020];6:525-30. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542-3565(08)00116-X
8. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol [internet]. 2008 [Citado 12/05/2020];103:27-37. Disponible en: https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=17900331
9. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol gastrointest Liver Physiol [internet]. 2006 [Citado 12/05/2020];290:G988-97. Disponible en: http://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2005?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
10. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, et al. International high resolution manometry working group. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2015 [Citado 12/05/2020];27(2):160-74. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25469569/
11. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology [internet]. 2008 [Citado 12/05/2020];135:1526-33. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/18722376/
12. Arora Z, Thota PN, Sanaka MR. Achalasia: current therapeutico options. Ther Adv Chronic Dis [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 20/07/2020],8(6-7):101-8 Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502956/
13. Andolfi C, Fisichella PM. Meta-analysis of clinical outcome after treatment for achalasia based on manometric subtypes. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 20/07/2020];106(4):332-41. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11049
14. Roman S, Gyawali CP, Yinglian Xiaio, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am [Internet]. 2014 [Citado 20/07/2020];24(4):545-61. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25216902/
15. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut [Internet]. 2008 [Citado 20/07/2020];57:405-23. Disponible en: http://gut.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17895358
16. Anido Escobar VM, Amable Díaz T, Díaz Drake Z, Morera Pérez M. Estudio de la motilidad esofágica en pacientes con esofagitis erosiva. Rev Cub Cir [Internet]. 2015 [Citado 20/07/2020];54(2):[Aprox. 2 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revcirugia.sld.cu/index.php/cir/article/view/311
17. Eikichi I, Kazumasa M, Keita F, Kazuhiko N. Diagnosis and Treatment Strategy of Achalasia Subtypes and Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction Based on High-Resolution Manometry. Digestion [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 20/07/2020];95:29-35. Disponible en: https://www.karger.com/?DOI=10.1159/000452354
18. World Medical Association. Declaración de Helsinki de la Asociación Médica Mundial. Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. 59ª Asamblea General; 2008 octubre; Seúl, Corea [Internet]. Francia: World Medical Association;2008 [Citado 20/08/2014]. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/es/30publications/10policies/b3/17c_es.pdf
19. Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal Motor Disorders in Terms of High-Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography: What Has Changed? Am J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2010 [Citado 20/07/2020];105:981-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2888528/
20. Yadlapati R. High resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice. Curr Opin Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 20/07/2020];33:301-9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568812/
21. Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Diseases Esophagus [Internet]. 2018 [Citado 20/07/2020];31(9):[Aprox. 2 p.]. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/dote/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/dote/doy071
22. Anido Escobar VM, Roque González R, Brizuela Quintanilla RA, Amable Díaz T, Perez Blanco L, Díaz Drake Z, et al. Caracterización de pacientes con Acalasia en Cuba (2006-2015). Rev Cubana Cir [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 20/07/2020];56(1):10-8. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932017000100002&lng=es.
23. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ. International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2012 [Citado 15/06/2020];24:57-65. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x
24. Patel A, Posner S, Prakash Gyawali. Esophageal high-resolution manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA [Internet]. 2018 [Citado 15/06/2020];320(12):[Aprox. 4 p.]. Disponible en: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.8694
25. Ji Hyun K, Sung Eun K, Yu Kyung Ch, Chul Hyun L, Moo In P, Jin Won H, et al. Factors determining the inter-observer variability and diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution manometry for esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2018 [Citado 15/06/2020];24(1):58-69. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753904/
26. Keller J. What is the impact of high resolution manometry in the functional diagnostic workup of gastroesophageal reflux disease?. Visc Med [Internet]. 2018 [Citado 15/06/2020];34:101-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/29888238/
27. Mion F. Achalasia guideline: another step towards standardization of its management. United European Gastroenterology Journal [Internet]. 2020 [Citado 15/05/2020];8(1):9-10. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640620902570
28. Sanagapalli S, Roman S, Hastier A, Leong RW, Patel K, Raeburn A, et al. Achalasia diagnosed despite normal integrated relaxation pressure responds favorably to therapy. Neurogastroenterol Motility [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 12/05/2020];31(5):[Aprox. 2 p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13586
29. Duffiel JA, Hamer PW, Heddle R, Holloway R, Myers JC, Thompson SK. Incidence of Achalasia in south australia based on esophageal manometry findings. Clinical Gastroenterology Hepatology [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 12/05/2020];15:360-5. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542-3565(16)30271-3
30. Triggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, Jain A, Tye MY, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Upright integrated relaxation pressure facilitates characterization of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterology and Hepat [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 12/05/2020];7(11) :2218-26. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542-3565(19)30071-0
Download PDF
