Efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy. Clinical trial

Authors

  • Osvaldo Raiko Seijas Cabrera Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso
  • Enrique Olazábal García Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso
  • Maricela Morera Pérez Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso
  • Frank Pérez Triana Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso
  • Elizabeth Montes de Oca Mejías Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso
  • Jorge Luis García-Menocal Hernández Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso

Abstract

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for the study of colon’s disease and in certain pathologies a therapeutic option. Colon insufflation normally performed using ambient air which led this technique to be painful. Insufflation with carbon dioxide (CO2) causes less abdominal pain.

Objective: To evaluate, the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy.

Material and Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (Phase IIb) was performed. Universe: all patients with indication of colonoscopies that met the selection criteria and assist to the Minimal Access Surgery National Centre in Havana in the period from October to December 2014. The sample consisted of a total of 100 patients over 18 years of which 50 were subject to the air insufflation technique and 50 with CO2 insufflation.
Results: Abdominal pain after colonoscopy was significantly lower in the group that received the CO2 insufflation. Hypoxemia and propofol doses used were similar in both groups. CO2 average pressure values were higher in the case of the CO2 group during the procedure but within the normal range; without clinical complications.
Conclusions: The use of CO2 in colonoscopy causes significantly less pain in the first hour. Its use in patients with deep sedation is safe and the technique is not altered and doesn’t have a time reduction.

 Keywords: Colonoscopy, carbon dioxide, efficacy, safety, clinic trial, abdominal pain, hypoxemia, sedation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Osvaldo Raiko Seijas Cabrera, Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso

Gastroenteròlogodel Centro Nacional de Cirugìa de Mìnimo Acceso. La Habana.

References

1. Lieberman D. Progress and Challenges in Colorrectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2115-26.

2. Valori, J-F. Rey, W. S. Atkin, M. Bretthauer, C. Senore et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012; 44(S 03):SE88–SE105.

3. Raju G, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R. Endoscopic management of colonoscopic perforations. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74,6 : 1380–1388.

4. Sanabria E, Seoane A, Araujo I, García A, Márquez L, et al. Incidencia de complicaciones de la colonoscopia en un programa de cribado poblacional de cáncer colorrectal: estudio prospectivo multicéntrico. Endoscopy 2013; 45- A 64. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1354669.

5. Boley SJ, Agrawal GP, Warren AR, Veith FJ, Levowitz BS, TreiberW, et al. Pathophysiologic effects of bowel distension on intestinal blood flow. Am J Surg 1969;117: 228-34.

6. Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1984;30:68-70.

7. Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J, Norman G, Goodacre RL.Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gas-trointest Endosc 1992;38:564-7.

8. Sumanac K, Zeally I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK,et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO2 insuf-flation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial eva-luating a new commercially available CO2 delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:190-4.

9. Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Gisselsson L, Grot-mol T, Skovlund E, et al. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer pre-vention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air inssuflation in colonoscopy. Gut 2002;50:604-7.

10. Church J, Delaney C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:322-6.

11. Díez P, Gil P, Alcaide N, Atienza R, Barrio J, de la Serna C, Pérez-Miranda M. Comparación entre la insuflación con aire ambiente o con dióxido de carbono durante la colonoscopia en pacientes sedados con propofol. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012;104: 411-417.

12. Kiriyama S, Naito H, Fukuchi M, Yuasa K, Horiuchi K, Kuwano H, Saito Y. Improvement of Abdominal Distention and Pain After Colonoscopy Without Sedation Using Carbon Dioxide Insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75, 4: AB282–AB283.

13. Wong JC, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong DC, Chung CC, Li MK. Towards painless colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial on carbon dioxide-insufflating colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg 2008;78: 871-4.

14. Rogers BH. Carbon dioxide for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1980;78: 1659-60.

15. Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B, Rieder E, Karner-Hanusch J, Dirlea D, et al. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2009;121: 464-8.

16. Yamano H, Yoshikawa K, Kimura T, Yamamoto E, Harada E, KudouT, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gasvolume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partialCO2 pressure. J Gastroenterol 2010;45: 1235-40.

17. Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q, Wei JF, Chen XF, Zhou DK, et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35 (10):1145-54.

18. Vázquez-Sequeiros E. Insuflación con dióxido de carbono en endoscopia: ¿lujo o necesidad? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012; 104 (8):395-398.

19. Sajid MS, Caswell J, Bhatti MI, Sains P, Baig MK, et all. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Disease, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 111–123, 2015.

20. Suzuki T, Minami H, Kotmasu T, Masusda R, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto A, et al. Prolonged carbon dioxide insufflation under general anesthesia for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2010; 42:1021-9.

21. Uraoka T, Kato J, Kuriyama M, Hori K, Ishikawa S, Harada K, et al. CO2 insufflation for potencially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopist. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(Supl 41):5186-2.

22. Ko CW, Riffle S, Shapiro JA, Saunders MD, Lee DS, Tung BY, et al.Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:648-56.

23. Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS, Chou J, Pignone M. Patients time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2401-10.

24. Rogers BH. The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonosco- pic electrosurgical polipectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1974;20:115-7.

25. M. Geyer, U. Guller, and Ch. Beglinger, “Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients,” Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, vol. 2012, Article ID 692532, 4 pages, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/692532.

26. Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:843-9.

27. Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosopy 2012; 44(02): 128-136.

28. Seebach L, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C. “Sparing the surgeon”: Clinical experience with over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal perforation. Endoscopy 2010;42:1108-11.

Published

2016-10-02

How to Cite

1.
Seijas Cabrera OR, Olazábal García E, Morera Pérez M, Pérez Triana F, Montes de Oca Mejías E, García-Menocal Hernández JL. Efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy. Clinical trial. Rev haban cienc méd [Internet]. 2016 Oct. 2 [cited 2025 Jul. 3];15(5):688-701. Available from: https://revhabanera.sld.cu/index.php/rhab/article/view/971

Issue

Section

Clinical and pathological sciences